Railroad corporations have played an important role in the growth and development of economies around the world. In the early years of the railroad, companies would often compete fiercely with one another for territory and market share. However, as the industry matured, agreements between railroad corporations to divide territory and negotiate rates became much more common.

These agreements, known as pooling agreements, were designed to allow multiple railroads to operate in the same territory without engaging in direct competition with one another. Under a pooling agreement, the railroads would divide their territories into specific operating regions, with each company being responsible for transportation within its assigned territory.

Pooling agreements were also used to negotiate rates and ensure that each company received a fair share of the profits from the transportation of goods. This was particularly important in areas where multiple railroads might operate, as competition between the companies could drive down rates and harm the profitability of all involved.

While pooling agreements were generally beneficial to the railroads involved, they were not without controversy. Some saw these agreements as a violation of the principles of free competition, while others argued that they allowed companies to engage in price-fixing and other illegal activities.

Despite these controversies, pooling agreements remained a common feature of the railroad industry well into the 20th century. Today, however, they are much less common, as changes in regulation and increased competition have made it more difficult for companies to reach such agreements.

In conclusion, agreements between railroad corporations to divide territory and negotiate rates were an important feature of the early railroad industry. While they were controversial at times, they helped to ensure the efficient operation of the railroads and enabled companies to work together to achieve common goals. While they may not be as common today, the legacy of these agreements can still be seen in many aspects of modern railroad regulation and operations.